The US is Set to Cancel Funding for Two Major Direct-Air-Capture Plants

The US is Set to Cancel Funding for Two Major Direct-Air-Capture Plants

Estimated Reading Time: ~6 minutes

• The US Department of Energy is reportedly canceling over $1 billion in funding for two major direct-air-capture (DAC) plants: the South Texas Direct Air Capture Hub and Project Cypress.
• This potential cancellation introduces significant uncertainty for the nascent carbon removal industry, impacting investor confidence and the nation’s commitment to climate innovation.
• Direct-air-capture technology is crucial for achieving global climate goals by mid-century, despite its current high costs and energy intensity.
• Industry leaders emphasize the continued necessity for DAC to reach gigaton-scale carbon removal, with companies like Climeworks and Heirloom bracing for potential shifts.
• Ensuring continued progress in carbon removal requires consistent policy, robust public-private partnerships, and sustained investment in R&D to scale DAC and reduce costs.

• The US is Set to Cancel Funding for Two Major Direct-Air-Capture Plants
• Key Takeaways
• The Promise and Peril of Direct Air Capture
• Unpacking the Financial Halt: What Does It Mean?
• Navigating Forward: Actionable Steps for Carbon Removal
  • 1. Advocate for Consistent Policy & Funding
  • 2. Foster Public-Private Partnerships
  • 3. Invest in R&D and Scalability Solutions
• Real-World Example: Orca, Iceland
• Conclusion
• Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

In the urgent global race against climate change, direct-air-capture (DAC) technology stands as a crucial, albeit nascent, front-line defense. These innovative facilities are designed to pull carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, offering a vital tool to complement emission reductions and help meet ambitious climate targets. However, the future of two such monumental projects in the United States now hangs precariously in the balance, facing potential federal funding termination.

The implications of such a decision could ripple through the burgeoning carbon removal industry, affecting not only the immediate projects but also investor confidence and the nation’s commitment to climate innovation. As the world increasingly grapples with the severe consequences of a warming planet, the role of technologies like DAC becomes ever more critical, making any setback a cause for significant concern.

The US Department of Energy appears poised to terminate funding for a pair of large carbon-sucking factories that were originally set to receive more than $1 billion in government grants, according to a department-issued list of projects obtained by MIT Technology Review and circulating among federal agencies. One of the projects is the South Texas Direct Air Capture Hub, a facility that Occidental Petroleum’s 1PointFive subsidiary planned to develop in Kleberg County, Texas. The other is Project Cypress in Louisiana, a collaboration between Battelle, Climeworks, and Heirloom. The list notes that around $50 million has been terminated for both projects, the initial tranche of federal funding for the developments. Each could have received about $500 million as the projects proceeded, according to the DOE announcement in 2023. It’s not immediately clear if the termination of the initial grants means the full funding will also be canceled.

“It could mean nothing,” says Erin Burns, executive director of Carbon180, a nonprofit that advocates for the removal and reuse of carbon dioxide. “It could mean there’s a renegotiation of the awards. Or it could mean they’re entirely cut. But the uncertainty certainly doesn’t help projects.”

This sentiment underscores the immediate challenge facing these ambitious initiatives: a lack of clarity that can stall progress and deter future investment.

Both Battelle and 1PointFive have yet to publicly respond to inquiries regarding this development. Meanwhile, major players in the DAC space are bracing for potential changes. “Market rumors have surfaced, and Climeworks is prepared for all scenarios,” stated Christoph Gebald, one of Climeworks’ co-CEOs. He emphasized the growing necessity for DAC as global climate goals remain elusive, stressing the need to achieve gigaton capacity for carbon removal. Heirloom echoed the uncertainty, noting, “We aren’t aware of a decision from DOE and continue to productively engage with the administration in a project review.”

These projects, integral to the DOE’s Regional Direct Air Capture Hubs program, were established under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The overarching goal was to create multiple large-scale carbon removal clusters across the US, each designed to capture and sequester at least a million tons of greenhouse gas annually. Such hubs are vital for demonstrating the technology’s viability and scaling up operations to meet the immense climate challenge.

The Promise and Peril of Direct Air Capture

The rising dangers of climate change have profoundly driven the development of the direct-air capture industry in recent years. Scientific consensus, supported by sophisticated climate models, indicates that the world may need to extract billions of tons of carbon dioxide per year from the atmosphere by mid-century. This monumental effort is in addition to drastic emission reductions, all crucial steps to prevent the planet from warming beyond the critical 2˚C threshold.

Carbon-sucking direct-air factories are widely regarded as one of the most reliable methods for drawing greenhouse gases directly out of the atmosphere. Their ability to capture CO2 irrespective of its source makes them a powerful tool in the climate mitigation arsenal. However, this technology also remains one of the most expensive and energy-intensive methods currently available. This economic and energetic hurdle has historically been a significant barrier to widespread adoption and scalability.

Recognizing the immense potential and inherent challenges, the US government, under former President Joe Biden, began providing increasingly generous grants, subsidies, and other forms of support. This strategic investment aimed to help scale up the nascent sector, reduce costs through innovation, and establish the necessary infrastructure for large-scale carbon removal. The potential cancellation of these grants now raises questions about the long-term commitment to these foundational initiatives.

Unpacking the Financial Halt: What Does It Mean?

The potential termination of federal funding for the South Texas Direct Air Capture Hub and Project Cypress signals a moment of profound uncertainty for the US carbon removal landscape. While the initial $50 million represents a fraction of the potential $1 billion-plus investment, its cancellation could be a harbinger of broader shifts in policy or priorities. Without immediate clarification from the Department of Energy, stakeholders are left to navigate a landscape fraught with speculation.

The lack of a definitive statement from the DOE only exacerbates the challenge. Is this a strategic recalculation, a temporary pause for renegotiation, or a complete withdrawal of support? Each scenario carries different implications for the involved companies—Occidental Petroleum’s 1PointFive, Battelle, Climeworks, and Heirloom—and for the broader industry. Such ambiguity can significantly deter private sector investment, which is crucial for the development and deployment of high-cost technologies like DAC.

“Today’s news that a decision to cancel lawfully designated funding for the [direct-air-capture projects] could come soon risks handing a win to competitors abroad and undermines the commitments made to businesses, communities, and leaders in Louisiana and South Texas,” warned Giana Amador of the Carbon Removal Alliance and Ben Rubin of the Carbon Business Council in a joint statement.

This highlights a critical concern: if the US falters in its commitment, other nations eager to lead in climate technology could gain a significant advantage, potentially leaving American companies behind in a crucial emerging market.

Navigating Forward: Actionable Steps for Carbon Removal

Regardless of the final outcome of the current funding situation, the need for robust carbon removal strategies persists. To ensure the US remains a leader in climate innovation and effectively addresses its environmental goals, several actionable steps are essential:

1. 1. Advocate for Consistent Policy & Funding

   Political will and stable, long-term funding commitments are paramount. The DAC industry, like many nascent but essential technologies, requires predictable government support to scale. Citizens, businesses, and environmental organizations should advocate for bipartisan policies that prioritize climate innovation and provide a clear financial roadmap for critical projects. This stability reduces risk for private investors and fosters an environment where innovation can thrive.

2. 2. Foster Public-Private Partnerships

   Collaboration between government agencies, private industry, academic institutions, and local communities is crucial. While federal grants are vital, diverse funding streams and shared expertise accelerate progress. For example, Project Cypress itself is a collaboration, demonstrating the power of pooled resources and knowledge. These partnerships can de-risk projects, share burdens, and leverage the unique strengths of each sector to overcome technical and financial hurdles.

3. 3. Invest in R&D and Scalability Solutions

   Continued investment in research and development is vital to drive down the cost and energy intensity of DAC technology. Exploring new materials, improving energy efficiency, and developing modular, scalable designs can make DAC more economically viable. Focusing on innovations that streamline the capture process and efficiently utilize renewable energy sources will be key to achieving gigaton-scale carbon removal.

Real-World Example: Orca, Iceland

A compelling example of operational direct air capture is Climeworks’ Orca plant in Iceland. While much smaller in scale than the proposed US hubs, Orca began operations in 2021 and demonstrates the practical application of DAC technology. It captures thousands of tons of CO2 annually, which is then permanently stored underground by Carbfix. This facility, powered by renewable geothermal energy, showcases that DAC is not just a theoretical concept but a working solution, providing valuable data and experience for larger-scale endeavors. Its success highlights the potential when innovation, technology, and suitable geological conditions align, offering a glimpse into what the US hubs aspire to achieve on a much grander scale.

Conclusion

The potential cancellation of over a billion dollars in federal funding for two cornerstone direct-air-capture plants in the US represents a critical juncture for the nation’s climate strategy. While the final decision remains pending, the mere possibility injects uncertainty into a sector vital for achieving global climate goals. Direct air capture is not a silver bullet, but it is an indispensable tool in the fight against a warming planet, requiring sustained commitment and investment.

The path forward demands clarity, consistency, and a renewed dedication to fostering innovative climate solutions. The world cannot afford to slow its progress on carbon removal, and how the US navigates this funding dilemma will significantly impact its leadership in addressing one of humanity’s most pressing challenges. Understanding the complexities of direct air capture and carbon removal is crucial for our collective future. Explore more articles on sustainable technologies and advocate for policies that support a greener tomorrow. Your engagement can make a difference in shaping effective climate action.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)