How to Spot DeFi Ponzi Schemes Before They Drain Your Wallet

How to Spot DeFi Ponzi Schemes Before They Drain Your Wallet

Estimated reading time: 9 minutes

• Scrutinize Tokenomics: Beware of “Ponzi-type tokens” like FTT that lack genuine utility, asset backing, or revenue share, relying solely on new investor capital.
• Vet Management & Fund Use: Investigate project teams for transparent fund management, verifiable identities, and proof against misappropriation of user assets.
• Demand Transparency & Audits: Prioritize protocols with publicly verifiable code, independent security audits, and comprehensive financial transparency beyond mere proof of reserves.

• Abstract and Introduction
• What is Ponzi?
• The FTX Collapse
  • FTT
  • Diversion
• Future Directions
  • Regulation
  • Transparency
• Concluding Remarks
• References
• Key Takeaways and Actionable Steps to Avoid DeFi Ponzi Schemes
  • 1. Scrutinize Tokenomics and True Utility
  • 2. Vet Management and Watch for Fund Misappropriation
  • 3. Prioritize Transparency and Audits
• Conclusion
• Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Abstract and Introduction

The decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem promises innovation, financial freedom, and unprecedented opportunities. Yet, amidst the excitement, lurking threats like Ponzi schemes can turn potential gains into devastating losses. Understanding the mechanics of these insidious operations is crucial for safeguarding your digital assets. The recent collapse of major crypto entities serves as a stark reminder of the inherent risks when trust is misplaced and fundamental financial principles are ignored.

To help you navigate these treacherous waters, we delve into the anatomy of such schemes, particularly as they manifest in the DeFi space. We’ll use a detailed analysis of a significant market event to illuminate the red flags and equip you with the knowledge to identify and avoid Ponzi-like structures before they drain your wallet.

What is Ponzi?

A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to earlier investors with money taken from later investors. In the DeFi context, as seen with “Ponzi-type tokens” like FTT, these schemes often involve digital assets that lack intrinsic value, asset backing, or genuine revenue generation. Their perceived value and ability to deliver promised returns are entirely dependent on a continuous influx of new capital from unsuspecting participants, making them inherently unsustainable and prone to catastrophic collapse.

The FTX Collapse

The story of FTX starts with its founder SBF. Though there already existed hundreds of CEXes and strong competitors such as Coinbase or Binance, SBF still decided to launch a new crypto exchange FTX in April 2019. The growth of FTX was sped up by cooperating with a good market maker Alameda to provide liquidity. Interestingly, Alameda is also founded by SBF. The great collaboration between FTX and Alameda made FTX rapidly grow up to the global Top3 CEX, and made the valuation of FTX balloon in size to $32 billion as of January 2022. With such success, FTX naturally launched its self-issued token FTT just like most centralised exchanges. However, with all the familiar stages in order – token boom and a fad for it, then leverage and diversion, then problem revealed and panic followed close behind, FTX finally fell into its crash. In this section, we decompose this disastrous speculation and demonstrate three facilitators that explain the FTX collapse, namely FTT, leverage, and diversion.

FTT

FTT is the utility token of FTX centralised exchange, mostly used for lowering trading fees on the platform. Like most other cryptocurrencies, FTT is an inherent Ponzi-type token, meaning that it is not backed by any asset. The FTT issuers raise money from the first wave of investors with a near-zero cost, just like the initiating debt in any Ponzi game. FTT may sustain, or may even achieve a rational Ponzi game if it can maintain a relatively stable or increasing market value and be actively traded in a healthy way. But unfortunately, FTT performs weaker than people previously believed. FTT does not entitle users to a part of the platform revenue or represent a share in FTX, nor give control over governance decisions or FTX’s treasury. However, these are not the very causes of its own collapse, the essence of financial distress is loss of confidence. The change in the mindsets of investors from confidence to pessimism is due to the excessive leverage and divert operations conducted by FTX and Alameda.

With such financial approach, FTT was used as collateral to raise a significant amount of money in the market, covering a series of CEXes and DeFi protocols, and thus making its virtual value be magnified thousands of times (leverage). At a high level, FTT plays a very similar role of M0 (currency & bank reserves) in traditional finance, but the actual impacts of FTT and related derivatives make up M1 (money easily used in transactions), or even M2 (money easily used in or converted into use for transactions and real GDP).

Diversion

In addition to the previous two factors, the misuse of customers’ funds also facilitates the FTX collapse all along. As shown in Fig.3, FTX and Alameda only circulate a small portion of the total supply of the FTT, meaning they are able to control the FTT price with funds easily. On top of this, the vast majority of coins were held by FTX, Alameda, and other associated companies. They continuously borrow money from investors and entities with FTT as collateral. To further promote the asset price, FTT managers start to misappropriate the users’ reserves (divert). In this sense, the booming of FTX is vigilant. In retrospect, we know that SBF also spent a lot in donating to political parties, heavy marketing and even bailing out other insolvent companies. But there are nearly no external restrictions on how he can use the funds. The game ends in a panic when all problems are revealed. FTX and Alameda were not solvent, and SBF finally paused the withdrawals, marking the official ending of the story.

The FTX crisis was not isolated but a sequel to the previous Luna/UST failure, also the beginning of a new series of collapses. The previous big collapses of Three Arrows Capital and Terra/Luna meant the market participants were extremely vigilant when it came to any rumors of potential insolvency. The collapse of FTX further damaged the already shaken reputation of the crypto industry. Besides losing customers’ and investors’ funds, the collapse of FTX is already having a knock-on effect on other companies and the overall crypto market. Solana and BlockFi are among the most severely affected projects. We refer readers interested in detailed information on this event to the reports by CoinDesk and Nansen.

Future Directions

With lessons learned from the FTX’s crash, we discuss possible ways for better security and sustainability in this area.

Regulation

Regulation has been debated since the emergence of cryptocurrencies. On the one side, users moving from traditional finance to crypto space are with strong motivations of pursuing decentralization. Regulation is naturally placed in the opposite position. The collapse of FTX raises concerns from users to worry about potential regulatory implications such as heavy regulations or strict policies. However, on the flip side, each time such an influential event happens, a large number of players, unfortunately, run away quickly from crypto. Meanwhile, the leave of some giants makes it easier for the remaining ones to form a monopoly, making regulatory intervention the only viable solution at this moment. Therefore, properly introducing regulation into CEXes and even the DeFi world may seem necessary.

Transparency

Transparency is another alternative, which seems more desirable. Many CEXes already created proof of reserves of assets as evidence delivered to the public. However, the proof of reserve cannot reflect the full picture of exchange solvency such as the liabilities. CEXes and CeFi-related tools need to rely on external forces to restore markets’ confidence. In contrast, DeFi protocols naturally inherit a series of advantages of on-chain transparency, selfcustody&governance, and fair access for participants. The logic and rules written in smart contracts are fully transparent that can be publicly checked by anyone. But it still is not an ideal solution due to its high security risks. Any logic error or loop bugs will be continuously running until the system crashes. Abilities on self-calibrating&correcting are absent. Thus prior security audits are of particular importance to DeFi protocols.

Concluding Remarks

In this paper, we dig into the root reasons for FTX collapse. By comparing it with a rational Ponzi model, we identify major violations that break the game rules and as a result, lead to the final crash. Although there are possible ways to avoid similar disasters, none are without their flaws. Further endeavors are required for establishing sustainable token ecosystems. At last, we deliver three pieces of home-taking messages as summaries.

References

• CoinMarketCap. Cryptocurrency Prices, Charts And Market Capitalizations —CoinMarketCap, 2022. [Online; accessed 19-Nov-2022].
• CoinDesk. Divisions in Sam Bankman-Fried’s Crypto Empire Blur on His Trading Titan Alameda’s Balance Sheet, 2022.
• Khaitan Tarang. Solana endures ‘crucible’ as ftx connection deletes 70% of tv. Accessible at , 2022.
• Gilbert Aleksandar. Ftx-backed bitcoin and ether tokens depeg on solana. Accessible at , 2022.
• Shumba Camomile. Us justice department wants ftx fraud allegations to be investigated. Accessible at .
• Vogelsteller Fabian and Buterin Vitalik. Erc-20 token standard.
• Gavin Wood et al. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum yellow paper, 151(2014):1–32, 2014.
• Kaushik Basu. The ponzi economy. Scientific American, 310(6):70–75, 2014.
• Sam M Werner, Daniel Perez, Lewis Gudgeon, Ariah Klages-Mundt, Dominik Harz, and William J Knottenbelt. Sok: Decentralized finance (defi). arXiv preprintarXiv:2101.08778, 2021.
• Khoo Yong Li, Leow Sandra, Choe Louisa, Polk Niklas, and Chia Douglas. Blockchain analysis: The collapse of alameda and ftx. Accessible at , 2022.
• Dalia Ramirez. Ftx crash: Timeline, fallout and what investors should know.
• Jakub. Ftx collapse – what is the path forward for crypto. , 2021.
• CoinDesk. The FTX Downfall: Full Coverage – Follow the key developments of the unraveling of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire and exchange, FTX. Accessible at , 2022.
• Nathan, Reiff and Vikki, Velasquez. The Collapse of FTX: What Went Wrong with the Crypto Exchange? , 2022.
• Forbes. The Collapse Of FTX. , 2022.
• Wikiwand. Bankruptcy of ftx. , 2022.
• Fernau Owen. Crypto users jump to defi platforms in wake of ftx’s cefi crash. Accessible at .
• Fernau Owen. Stablecoins show signs of stabilizing after ftx storm. Accessible at .
• Investor.gov U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Ponzi Scheme, 2022. [Online; accessed 19-Nov-2022].
• Stephen A O’Connell and Stephen P Zeldes. Rational ponzi games. International Economic Review, pages 431–450, 1988.
• Shange Fu, Qin Wang, Jiangshan Yu, and Shiping Chen. Rational ponzi games in algorithmic stablecoin. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11928, 2022.
• Olivier J Blanchard and Philippe Weil. Dynamic efficiency, the riskless rate, and debt ponzi games under uncertainty. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1992.
• Wiki. Pareto efficiency. Accessible at , 2021.
• PitchBook. PitchBook Profile – FTX, 2022. [Online; accessed 19-Nov-2022].
• Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Yaroslav Afonin, Ludovico Lazzaretti, and Arthur Gervais. Cefi vs. defi–comparing centralized to decentralized finance. Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT), 2021.
• Marshall Van Alstyne. Why bitcoin has value. Communications of the ACM, 57(5):30–32, 2014.
• George T McCandless, Warren E Weber, et al. Some monetary facts. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 19(3):2–11, 1995.

The detailed analysis of the FTX collapse provides invaluable lessons for anyone involved in the crypto space, especially in DeFi. By dissecting the roles of FTT, leverage, and diversion, we can derive concrete steps to protect ourselves from similar “Ponzi-type” schemes.

1. Scrutinize Tokenomics and True Utility

As the FTX case illustrates with FTT, a token that acts as an “inherent Ponzi-type token” lacking genuine asset backing, platform revenue share, or governance rights is a major red flag. Its value primarily relies on continuous new investment.

Actionable Step: Always perform due diligence on a project’s tokenomics. Ask:

• What is the token’s real utility? Does it offer more than just fee reduction or speculative value?
• Is it backed by tangible assets or actual platform revenue? Or does its sustenance solely depend on new investors buying in?
• Does it confer governance rights or ownership? Tokens without these fundamental benefits are often designed to be easily manipulated or to extract value from new participants.

2. Vet Management and Watch for Fund Misappropriation

The “Diversion” aspect of the FTX collapse highlights the critical danger of centralized control over funds and the lack of external restrictions on how leadership can use assets. SBF’s ability to “misappropriate the users’ reserves” led directly to the scheme’s unraveling.

Actionable Step: Investigate the project team and their track record. Look for:

• Clear and verifiable identities of key personnel. Anonymous teams often have less accountability.
• Transparent fund management policies. How are user funds stored? Who controls them? Are there multi-signature wallets for community funds?
• Proof of reserves (and liabilities). While “proof of reserves” is a start, it “cannot reflect the full picture of exchange solvency such as the liabilities.” Seek projects that offer comprehensive financial transparency, not just selective disclosures.

3. Prioritize Transparency and Audits

The “Future Directions” section emphasizes “Transparency” and “Regulation” as crucial for the industry’s sustainability. While DeFi inherently offers on-chain transparency through smart contracts, this doesn’t guarantee security. Logic errors or bugs can still lead to catastrophic failures.

Actionable Step: Demand and verify transparency and security audits for any DeFi protocol you consider.

• Look for publicly verifiable smart contract code. This allows anyone to scrutinize the underlying logic.
• Check for independent security audits from reputable firms. These audits help identify “logic error or loop bugs.” A protocol that undergoes regular, transparent audits demonstrates a commitment to security.
• Understand the project’s governance model. In truly decentralized projects, the community often has a say in how funds are managed and upgrades are implemented, reducing the risk of single-point-of-failure abuses.

Conclusion

The DeFi space offers revolutionary potential, but it is not immune to the age-old pitfalls of financial deception. The story of FTX, FTT, leverage, and the diversion of funds serves as a powerful cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power, opaque practices, and tokens lacking intrinsic value. By diligently researching tokenomics, scrutinizing management, and prioritizing transparency and security audits, you can significantly reduce your exposure to Ponzi-like schemes. The crypto industry, as a whole, requires “further endeavors… for establishing sustainable token ecosystems,” and your vigilance as an investor is a vital part of that progress.

Remember, if an investment promises “too good to be true” returns with little to no clear mechanism, it very likely is. Your best defense is a proactive approach rooted in education and critical analysis. Stay informed, stay vigilant, and protect your financial future in the decentralized world.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

• What is a DeFi Ponzi scheme?
• How did the FTX collapse relate to Ponzi schemes?
• What are red flags for a Ponzi-type token?
• Why is transparency important in DeFi?
• What steps can I take to protect myself?

What is a DeFi Ponzi scheme?

A DeFi Ponzi scheme, similar to traditional Ponzi schemes, is a fraudulent investment operation within the decentralized finance ecosystem. It typically promises high returns to early investors, paid out using funds collected from later investors, rather than from legitimate profits. In DeFi, this often manifests through “Ponzi-type tokens” that lack genuine asset backing, utility, or revenue share, relying solely on a continuous influx of new capital to maintain their perceived value.

How did the FTX collapse relate to Ponzi schemes?

The FTX collapse exhibited several characteristics akin to a Ponzi scheme, particularly through its native token FTT. FTT was described as an “inherent Ponzi-type token” because it lacked real asset backing or a share in FTX’s revenue, its value largely dependent on market speculation and new investors. Additionally, the excessive leverage and the diversion of customer funds by FTX and Alameda Research to prop up FTT’s value and cover other liabilities created an unsustainable structure that eventually collapsed when confidence was lost and withdrawals paused.

What are red flags for a Ponzi-type token?

Key red flags for a Ponzi-type token include:

• Lack of Real Utility: The token offers minimal actual utility beyond speculative trading or minor fee discounts.
• No Asset Backing/Revenue Share: It is not backed by tangible assets, platform revenue, or a share in the project’s profits.
• Reliance on New Investors: Its value and the ability to pay out existing investors depend entirely on a continuous stream of new money.
• Opaque Tokenomics: The supply, distribution, and burning mechanisms are unclear or heavily controlled by a central entity.
• Unrealistic Returns: Promises of consistently high, guaranteed returns with little explanation of how these profits are generated.

Why is transparency important in DeFi?

Transparency is crucial in DeFi because it allows participants to verify the legitimacy and solvency of protocols. While DeFi protocols naturally inherit on-chain transparency through publicly verifiable smart contracts, this isn’t enough. True transparency involves:

• Open-source code: Allowing anyone to review the underlying logic.
• Regular security audits: Identifying and fixing vulnerabilities.
• Clear financial disclosures: Beyond just proof of reserves, including liabilities to give a full picture of solvency.
• Decentralized governance: Reducing the risk of a single entity misusing funds or making unilateral, detrimental decisions.

What steps can I take to protect myself?

To protect yourself from DeFi Ponzi schemes:

• Do Your Own Research (DYOR): Thoroughly investigate tokenomics, project utility, and the team behind it.
• Scrutinize Tokenomics: Ensure tokens have genuine utility, asset backing, or a share in platform revenue, rather than relying solely on speculation.
• Vet Management: Look for verifiable identities, transparent fund management, and a strong, trustworthy track record from the project team.
• Prioritize Transparency & Audits: Only engage with protocols that have publicly verifiable code, independent security audits from reputable firms, and transparent financial reporting.
• Be Wary of High Returns: If an investment promises “too good to be true” returns, it most likely is. Understand how profits are generated.