When Disruption Became Dominance: How Big Tech Lost Its Way

Remember that feeling? The early days of the internet, when Silicon Valley buzzed with the promise of open roads and endless innovation. It felt like anything was possible – a new world being built, piece by digital piece, designed to connect us, empower us, and liberate information. Fast forward to today, and that shimmering vision feels, for many, a little tarnished. The roads have become toll booths, the connections often come with hidden costs, and the boundless innovation often seems to funnel into the hands of a few colossal entities.
It’s a sentiment that’s been brewing for a while, a quiet hum of disillusionment that occasionally erupts into a roar. Now, two prominent voices, Techdirt editor Mike Masnick and Common Tools CEO Alex Komoroske, have stepped forward, not just to lament, but to propose a path forward. At WIRED’s Big Interview event, they unveiled a manifesto designed to do what many are increasingly calling for: save Silicon Valley from itself. It’s a bold declaration, but one that many in and out of the tech world are ready to hear.
When Disruption Became Dominance: How Big Tech Lost Its Way
The story of Silicon Valley is, in many ways, a testament to American ingenuity. From garages and dorm rooms sprang companies that reshaped industries, changed human behavior, and accumulated unprecedented wealth and power. But somewhere along the line, the pursuit of innovation started to morph into something else. The drive to connect everyone gradually evolved into a race to own every connection. The ideal of an open internet began to give way to vast, proprietary “walled gardens.”
The Siren Call of Scale and Data
What started as a push for user experience quickly became an optimization for engagement – often at any cost. We saw the rise of business models centered on extracting and monetizing user data, transforming us from customers into products. The phrase “if you’re not paying for it, you’re the product” became a grim punchline rather than a warning. Algorithms, designed to show us what we “wanted,” inadvertently created echo chambers and amplified misinformation.
The relentless pursuit of scale and network effects led to consolidation. Smaller, innovative startups were often acquired or outmaneuvered by giants with seemingly infinite resources. This created an environment where true disruption became harder, replaced by incremental improvements within established ecosystems, or the swallowing of potential competitors whole. The vibrant, competitive landscape of yesteryear started to feel more like a series of fiefdoms ruled by a handful of tech monarchs.
The Manifesto’s Vision: Reclaiming Tech’s Founding Principles
Masnick and Komoroske’s manifesto isn’t about tearing down Silicon Valley, but rather rebuilding it on stronger, more ethical foundations. It’s a call to return to some of the core principles that made the early internet so revolutionary: openness, decentralization, user control, and genuine interoperability. These aren’t just technical terms; they are the bedrock of a healthy, competitive, and truly empowering digital future.
Interoperability: Breaking Down the Walled Gardens
Imagine being able to move your social network contacts, your chat history, or even your personalized streaming preferences seamlessly from one platform to another. That’s the promise of interoperability. Currently, if you leave a major social media platform, you often lose your social graph, your history, and your connections. This creates a powerful lock-in effect, making it incredibly difficult for new competitors to emerge or for users to exercise true choice.
The manifesto argues for a future where standard protocols allow services to ‘talk’ to each other, much like email works across different providers. This wouldn’t just foster competition; it would put users back in control of their digital lives. It would empower individuals to choose the best service for their needs, rather than being beholden to the largest platform with the most network effects.
User Control and Decentralization: Giving Power Back
Beyond interoperability, the manifesto champions greater user control over data and the decentralization of power. This means moving away from a model where a few centralized entities dictate what we see, what we can do, and how our data is used. It advocates for systems where individuals have more say in their online experience, where their data is truly theirs, and where they can migrate it or grant access on their own terms.
This shift isn’t just about privacy; it’s about fostering an environment where innovation can truly flourish outside the confines of corporate giants. Decentralized systems, often built on open standards, can enable smaller teams and even individuals to create powerful, user-centric tools without needing permission from, or fearing acquisition by, a dominant platform.
Beyond Manifestos: A New Ethos for Innovation
A manifesto is a starting point, a rallying cry. But for real change to happen, it requires more than just an eloquent declaration. It demands a fundamental shift in mindset, not just among the titans of tech, but across the entire ecosystem – from policymakers and investors to developers and, crucially, us, the users.
The Role of Policy and Conscious Consumption
Governments worldwide are beginning to grapple with the immense power of Big Tech, introducing regulations like the EU’s Digital Markets Act or exploring antitrust actions. These efforts can create the necessary guardrails, but policy alone isn’t enough. We, as consumers, also hold significant power. By actively seeking out and supporting services that prioritize privacy, open standards, and ethical design, we can signal demand for a different kind of technology.
Furthermore, the tech industry itself needs to internalize these principles. It means engineers pushing for open APIs, product managers designing with interoperability in mind, and founders building companies that value long-term societal benefit over short-term financial extraction. It’s about remembering that technology isn’t just a tool for profit; it’s a force that shapes societies, and with that power comes immense responsibility.
The Path Forward: A Return to Purpose
Saving Silicon Valley from itself isn’t about destroying what it built, but rather rediscovering its original purpose. It’s about channeling that incredible ingenuity and drive towards building a digital world that is truly empowering, equitable, and open for everyone. The manifesto from Masnick and Komoroske is a vital step, reminding us that the future of technology doesn’t have to be a predetermined trajectory towards ever-greater consolidation and control.
It’s a call for us all to remember that the internet, at its heart, was designed to be a network of networks, a platform for human connection and creativity. It’s time to move beyond the current paradigms, embrace the principles of openness and user control, and collaboratively build the next generation of tech – one that serves humanity first, allowing innovation to truly thrive once again.




